President Bush�s proposed 2003 budget, delivered to Congress Feb. 5,
no doubt left military contractors salivating.
His call for increased spending to secure the nation�s safety would
be expected in light of what happened on Sept. 11. But the American
people would be wise to put pressure on Mr. Bush and Congress to bring
some sanity to what is being proposed. After all, shoveling money to the
military industrial complex does not necessarily translate into a
stronger, more secure nation.
Mr. Bush�s budget requests $11 billion to tackle the threat of
biological terrorism. The $2 trillion-plus budget increases military
spending by 12 percent and calls for a 111 percent increase in homeland
security. Over the next five years, the military budget would increase
from the current $120 to $450 billion. It would amount to the largest
military build-up since the Cold War saber rattling.
Meanwhile, the President is still trumpeting tax cuts that benefit
his wealthy friends�much like the increased military spending does�while
cutting into social programs and reducing the budgets of such agencies
as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Army Corps of Engineers and
the Forest Service.
A high concern for some politicians, particularly Democrats, is that
Social Security funds are not tapped to pay down other programs.
"I think everybody understands our top obligation is to defend the
nation," said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.). "In
effect, what the administration is doing is taking Medicare and Social
Security funds and using them for tax cuts and additional spending. The
question for the country is whether that�s a wise direction for
America."
We think it is an unwise direction to use the "war on terrorism" to
grease the wheels of those contractors who build America�s potential
weapons of mass destruction. Would a missile defense shield somewhere in
outer space�with a price tag that our children will be paying for�have
stopped Richard Ried, the alleged shoe bomber?
Would another daisy cutter bomb have stopped an anthrax letter from
being mailed?
The question that continues to be left off the table for discussion
is why do these so-called terrorists hate America? If Mr. Bush would
seriously entertain that question, though it might hurt and cause some
trepidation in Israel, it might prove to be a better way to bring
military spending under control.
A by-product of such a discussion could be another hard to find
commodity�a measure of peace in the world.