by Ahmed Rufai and
Eric Ture Muhammad
(FinalCall.com) --Reconnaissance flights have increased over Somalia, Bush
administration officials announced Jan. 3, saying the U.S. was looking
for signs that Saudi-exile Osama bin Laden and the Al Qaeda network
might have set up a base in the African country.
Warships�either from the United States or its allies�were cruising
the Somali coast at Final Call press time, ready to board cargo
vessels suspected of containing terrorists heading from Asia to Africa.
Yemen is also on alert.
"We�ve always made clear that we felt that Somalia and the situation
that existed there made it a potential haven for terrorists," State
Department spokesman Richard Boucher acknowledged Jan. 3.
"This pretext of the war on terrorism is allowing the U.S. to
exercise a kind of imperialistic foreign policy for which it felt
restrained by negative international reaction," commented Chicago-based
columnist Salim Muwakkil. The pattern seems to be use of overwhelming
force on defenseless, or at least offense less, opponents, he said.
Anything goes when the government wages a war against neither a country
nor organized entity, the writer added. "There can be no surrender,
because terrorism is an abstract opponent and abstractions cannot say �I
surrender.� So, war goes on wherever the country says it does. That�s a
very dangerous framework," Mr. Muwakkil said.
"If there is some evidence that bin Laden is holed-up there, or has
escaped to Somalia, I think that the U.S. is more than justified in
doing some surgical maneuver to get him," Mel Foote, president of the
U.S. Constituency for Africa advocacy group, told The Final Call
from his Washington office. "But, I don�t think they should do an
indiscriminate bombing of Somali people. There is no climate of
anti-America fervor in Somalia. So, I would hate for the U.S. to go in
with this assumption, and take out large segments of the Somali
population too," he said.
Elombe Brath, of the New York-based Patrice Lumumba Coalition argues
that U.S. policy is steeped in "the geo-political strategic location of
the country of Somalia, sitting on the Suez Canal. The U.S. ally is the
landlocked neighbor of Somalia, Ethiopia, so the U.S. must control the
entrance to the canal for its land-locked ally. It is also a strategic
area, which gives the U.S. an ability to have a military presence in the
southern African region." Blacks need to pressure Congress to change
policy toward Africa, he said.
A Somali group, Al-Itihaad Al-Islamiya, also known as, "Islamic
Unity," is on the U.S. list of suspected terrorist groups. The group�s
goal, according to the State Department, is to create an Islamic state
in Somalia. U.S. officials further contend that the group has links to
Mr. bin Laden and the Al Qaeda network and have made contact with Somali
officials. The U.S. has yet to offer evidence of Al Qaeda activity
inside Somalia.
After dislodging the Taliban in Afghanistan, policymakers in
Washington are debating what to do about suspected terrorist cells in
the Horn of Africa, in particulaly, in Somalia.
The U.S. is building a coalition of Ethiopian and British forces, and
its apparent Somali target would be Al Itahaad, whose assets were frozen
by the U.S. in September.
Why is Somalia widely perceived as accused terrorist Osama bin
Laden�s potential place of refuge, home for a new Al Qaeda base and a
potential target for the U.S.-led "war on terrorism?" The country is
fragmented with no national government. Its new Transitional National
Government is one of several groups claiming the authority to govern,
and with its competing clan militias, Somalia may not be the safest
place for Mr. bin Laden or his alleged terror network.
Washington is believed to be interested in Somalia for three main
reasons: The first has to do with U.S. military intervention in 1993,
which ended in humiliation, with corpses of Special Forces soldiers
dragged through the streets. The failure of the military operation has
fueled wariness among policymakers when it comes to deploying U.S.
troops abroad and a desire for revenge among others in the military
establishment.
Secondly, the White House executive order that froze terrorist assets
Nov. 7 named several Somali individuals and firms. Further action
against Somalia could be seen as President Bush making good on his
promise to make his war a global operation, not just a fight with the
Taliban. The November executive order closing Al Barakaat shut down
money exchange offices on four continents. Closure of the money network
left most Somalis outside the country with no means of sending money
home. Some believe the closure would not have occurred if Western Union
operated in Somalia.
The third reason for U.S. interest concerns Ethiopia and the desire
to use Prime Minister Meles Zenawi as the U.S. agent in the region. The
Zenawi government also wants to see the fledging government in
Mogadishu, which is seen as largely lslamist, replaced by another
faction, and strengthen its hand in the region.
Since Sept. 11, Ethiopia has focused on Somalia and claims that the
Transitional National Government is closely linked to Al Itahaad.
Ethiopia backs the Somali Reconciliation and Reconstruction Council, one
of whose leaders, Hussein Mohamed Farah Aideed, only three years ago was
an ally of Al Itahaad.
Ethiopia blames Al Itahaad for bombings in Dire Dawa and Addis Ababa
and for the attempted July 1995 assassination of Transport Minister
Abdul Majeed Hussein, who is now ambassador to the United Nations. By
becoming Washington�s key ally in the region, Ethiopia hopes to write
the agenda for regional action against international terrorism and
pursue its own political objectives.
Its strategy includes getting U.S. help to destroy Al Itahaad.
Ethiopia has already given the U.S. detailed accounts of Somalia�s
Transitional National Government�s alleged meetings with Al Qaeda
representatives. Ethiopia has charged some members of Somalia�s National
Assembly are also Al Itahaad officials.
Ethiopia further claims that a Sept. 14 meeting attended by Al
ltahaad officials and the Transitional National Government was addressed
by Sheikh Abdurahman Hamad of Afghanistan. Ethiopia says a 10-member
committee was set up to investigate operational base options in Somalia
should the U.S. attack Afghanistan. The Transitional National Government
is backed by the United Nations while Ethiopia, backed by the U.S.,
supports the Somali Reconciliation and Reconstruction Council. Each side
is interested in direct or indirect post Sept. 11 U.S. support to help
discredit or eliminate the other.
Ethiopia wants to see the Transitional National Government eliminated
and opposes extension of the mandate for UN Political Office for
Somalia, which provides an international safety net for the Transitional
National Government. The UN Political Office for Somalia, like the rest
of the world, also does not recognize the self-proclaimed Republic of
Somaliland. The region declared independence from the rest of Somalia in
1991 and is well disposed toward Ethiopia.
Although Ethiopia wants to serve as the "Pakistan" of the Horn region
and aid U.S. invasion or activity, it realizes that large-scale,
long-term military activity requires help with supplies and
strengthening military morale.
Washington policy makers have consulted experts and debated the value
of U.S. or Ethiopian military intervention. Some U.S. military officials
are already assessing the situation on the ground. Somalia would likely
be the target of Ethiopian incursions�which would be U.S.-backed, but
not U.S. led. Somalia also offers very few clear military targets.
With substantial inter-African political intrigue at work�which
includes concerns about Sudan and potential problems for Kenya�some
Washington officials fear the U.S. government depends too heavily on
Ethiopia for intelligence in the region. The U.S. already helps Ethiopia
with training, logistics and growing political support. Washington is
weighing Special Operations options, presumably including the murder of
selected individuals. It is also feared that giving Ethiopian forces a
free hand would fuel instability well beyond Somalia�s borders.
President Daniel Arap Moi has complained that Kenya, which neighbors
both states, would suffer from increased Ethiopian intervention in
Somalia. Kenya is concerned about the possibility of more refugees and
the impact of Somali nationals living in Kenya.
The current surveillance flights are coming from Oman, looking for
any unusual activity that might indicate escaping Al-Qaeda leaders are
trying to make their way to Somalia. One of the aircrafts used, the P-3,
is equipped with optical sensors and cameras that survey broad areas of
ocean for the monitoring of unusual water traffic. According to reports,
the U.S. Navy has a list of more than 20 ships it believes are
potentially tied to Mr. bin Laden. Another aircraft, the EP-3, is used
to gather electronic intelligence and monitors communications in the
region.
There are at least six nations considered by America as possible
havens for Mr. bin Laden�Somalia, Sudan, Iraq, Yemen, Indonesia and the
Philippines.
Mel Foote lived in Somalia for three years while director for
Africare and later returned with a U.S. congressional contingent during
the 1990 civil war. The group had hoped to bring peace to that segment
of the Horn of Africa. With no lucrative mineral resource to speak of,
the flat-terrain of Somalia serves more of a strategic location than
anything else, yet still serves big oil interests, according to Mr.
Foote.
"Somalia represents another strategic point where it concerns these
(oil) shipping routes," he explained.
There have been rumors of oil discovery in Barowe, known as
Somaliland during British colonial rule, added Mr. Foote, who couldn�t
say whether the rumor was true or false.
Somalia descended into chaos largely due to benign neglect on the
part of the United States, that tried to help stop the civil war and
help feed people, but degenerated into chasing warlords and subsequent
death of U.S. soldiers, Mr. Foote argues.
"Our reaction to that was to pull out of the area completely-lock,
stock and barrel-letting the people fend for themselves. I�m not sure in
this new world order that is the way you behave�to get mad and then
ignore�but what that did was create an opportunity for anyone to come
in, including terrorist cells," he noted.
"Somalia is being targeted primarily on the prodding of the minority
regime of Ethiopia, mostly for its own reasons," said Professor Asgede
Hagos in a recent editorial in USAfrica, a newspaper published in
Houston. "Since soon after the Sept. 11, attack, the regime has been
trying to sell Washington on the idea that neighboring Somalia is a
terrorist haven," he continued. The professor said the U.S. must not let
herself be used in order to win a larger, protracted war. "The new game
in Somalia is to call your enemy a terrorist in the hope America will
destroy him for you," he wrote.
"The American government does not seem to be to concerned about what
happens in Africa. Black Americans must ask their government to help the
African governments in conflict such as Somalia," added Saeed Fahia,
executive director of the Confederation of Somali Communities in
Minnesota. "It would be helpful if Blacks here learned more about what
is happening in Somalian culture, particularly the clan issue. Unlike
Somalians, Blacks in America have influence with their Congress," he
said.
Black people worldwide should be concerned about the war on terror
and possibility of U.S. action against Somalia, said Dr. Conrad Worrill,
of the National Black United Front. "Africa is still suffering from the
hands of foreign intervention into the affairs of Africa, and the
African world community�s challenge is to acquire enough political and
economic power in the world to stop this practice of foreign
intervention by the former slave trading nations,"
said Dr. Worrill. Hopefully the African Union, and eventually a United
States of Africa, will provide the unity and power to stop imposition in
African affairs, he said.
(Dora Muhammad and Saeed Shabazz contributed to this report.)