One could imagine that it was in the spirit of Dr.
Martin Luther King Jr. that President Clinton recently took the
opportunity to speak forthrightly on issues that significantly impact
the poor and the oppressed in this country. Or one could surmise it
was a convenient opportunity to do what he didn�t do in the eight
years he has been head of state.
In a package of recommendations sent to Congress
which also were discussed in an op-ed piece he penned in the New
York Times, President Clinton made recommendations that he said
would improve race relations in the country. He called for such noble
and sensible actions such as, passing a law that makes the epidemic of
racial profiling by law enforcement agencies a crime; giving convicted
death row inmates greater access to DNA testing and competent counsel
for defendants in death penalty cases; reducing the disparity between
crack and powder cocaine sentencing, a position Blacks have been
demanding for years; a review of mandatory minimum sentencing for
non-violent offenders; and giving back the right to vote to felons who
have served their time.
President Clinton also promoted another sensible
idea bandied around for years, that of making Election Day a national
holiday. And he recommended setting up a commission to appoint a
nonpartisan commission on electoral reform. The commission, headed by
people like former presidents Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford, would
gather facts and determine the "causes of voter disparities,
including those involving race, class and ethnicity."
These lofty recommendations offered by the
President come curiously as he is exiting office, when the sun is
setting on his administration. So couching his message in the context
of a King Day observance somewhat is contradictory to what King stood
for. But the tactic was no different from others who find it
convenient every year around this time to cloak themselves in the King
Legacy garment, while during the other 364 days of the year they are
sleeping with the enemies of the poor and oppressed.
Dr. King spoke during the daylight against the
Vietnam war and was vilified for it. He walked the streets at high
noon laying out the injustices that were being waged against the
working poor. For that he was spat upon and had rocks and eggs thrown
at him. His voice was a threat to the powers of that day not because
he wanted to integrate a bathroom, but because his message could
enliven the dormant power of a mass mobilization of men, women and
children�families�that could threaten those powers that determine
where wars would be fought, who would eat and who wouldn�t. The
challenge for those who want to talk King today is to now walk the
walk of Dr. King.
During his life, Dr. King did not endorse a party
in any political race. He said he wanted to remain independent of such
politics so that he could speak the truth to power. Today, Blacks have
been lulled to sleep in the cot of the Democratic Party and are too
afraid to go near the electrified blanket of the Republican Party.
This has not benefited the Black masses in a significant way in that
during every election we are taken for granted by one party, and
ignored by the other.
To those who muttered the words on Jan. 15,
"we have to keep the dream alive," your challenge is to
throw some cold water on your face and realize that the dream is
economic, racial, political and social justice. It is not being able
to stand on a platform with a mayor or even the president and sing
"We Shall Overcome."
The challenge is to make the dream a reality by
creating communities of our own where we can live in peace and develop
an economic base so that we won�t have to go begging others to
provide services that we should provide for ourselves.
This allows for the social and racial integration
that Dr. King saw, because then we show the world that we are a
self-dignified people and they can join us if they desire. But even if
they don�t, we�re going to march on to the Promised Land of true
and total liberation.