Mayoral runoff shows depth of NYC racial
divide |
by Saeed Shabazz
Staff Writer
NEW YORK (Finalcall.com) �Mark Green�s victory in the Oct. 11 democratic
mayoral primary runoff over Fernando Ferrer was thrown into question
just three days later, after the New York City Board of Elections said
the unofficial voter tally was off by potentially 200,000 ballots.
Board of Elections Deputy Director
Joseph Gentile stopped short of saying that the final count would change
the outcome. The Board was set to start the official count on Oct. 17.
The reason given by the Board for the
over count is a result of consolidating multiple election districts on
single machines in probably hundreds of districts. It appears that
counts for those machines were doubled erroneously.
Meanwhile, activists such as the Rev. Al
Sharpton had harsh words for mayoral hopeful Mark Green and the
Democratic Party, charging the democratic nominee did "everything he
could to polarize the city." Mr. Ferrer, 51, was trying to become New
York�s first Latino mayor.
Observers say that race became a factor
in late August when Rev. Al Sharpton endorsed Mr. Ferrer.
The projection of Rev. Sharpton as the
city�s race-baiting bogeyman is entirely a media creation, according to
Brooklyn school teacher Colette Caeser, a campaign worker for Mr. Ferrer.
"The media slandered Freddie Ferrer
because of the endorsement. They used that to further denigrate Mr.
Ferrer. He deserves credit for seeking to build a bridge between Blacks
and Latinos and even that was used by the media to alienate whites,
which further polarized the [mayoral] race," she said.
One New York tabloid, in the last week
of the campaign, ran cartoons portraying Rev. Sharpton as a flatulent,
grossly overweight puppeteer with Mr. Ferrer sitting on his lap, having
his strings pulled.
"The political pundits had picked
Freddie Ferrer to come in either third or last," Rev. Al Sharpton said
on Oct. 13 at his National Action Network (NAN) headquarters. "When they
found out that he had come in first [in the primary], there was
hysteria. You would think that we were not in New York in 2001, but in
Mississippi in 1961," Rev. Sharpton told his audience.
"On the strength of the coalition we
built, Freddie Ferrer defied the odds. Now they are mad with us because
we made Black and Latino voters count. Whatever happens from now on in
this city, the Democratic Party will learn that they cannot function
without us," he said.
Mr. Ferrer garnered 71 percent of the
Black vote and 84 percent of the Latino vote, but only about 16 percent
of the white vote. What turned it around for Mr. Green was that whites
turned out in the runoff, giving the Public Advocate 84 percent of their
vote, coupled with 29 percent of the Black vote. The white turnout was
low in the September 25 primary.
"The question of who really came out to
the polls on October 11 is important," Rev. Sharpton said during an
interview on a radio talk show. "What we want to know now is where were
the mistakes made. That will explain partially why we had an over
count," he said.
Bronx Democratic Party chairman Roberto
Ramirez agreed. "How are we to believe any thing that the Board of
Elections said?" he asked.
"Florida has come to New York City," Mr.
Ramirez said, adding, "The worst case scenario is that maybe thousands
of Black and Latino voters have been disenfranchised."
Rev. Sharpton said that NAN and the
state NAACP are holding their options open for a court challenge. The
runoff was the city�s third mayoral primary in a month. The polls were
open Sept. 11 when the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center halted
primary voting.
In the rescheduled primary on Sept. 25,
Fernando Ferrer was the top vote getter with 36 percent in a field of
four. Mark Green was second, but neither garnered the 40 percent
necessary to avoid a runoff.
The 2001 mayoral campaign had begun to
pick up momentum with candidates concentrating on education, affordable
housing and keeping crime low. After the attack on the Twin Towers, the
focus of the campaign shifted to questions over who would be a strong
enough leader to pull the city through a crisis of security, rebuilding
and economic recovery.
The race turned nasty just days before
the runoff election as Mr. Green unleashed a television ad questioning
Mr. Ferrer�s leadership skills. Mr. Ferrer fired back with an ad
accusing Mr. Green of breaking his pledge not to engage in negative
campaigning.
But on the streets, activists were
complaining that the television ad smacked of racism. It stereotyped Mr.
Ferrer, a Puerto Rican, as a man incapable of leading because of his
ethnicity, observers said.
Ferrer supporter Larry Hanley, head of
Local 726 of the Amalgamated Transit Union, who is white, said he, too,
was concerned about the divisive tone of Mr. Green�s campaign.
"I think there are many divisive forces
in our city. I don�t think Mark Green has objected to it," he said.
But Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan)
said Mark Green "has been a unifier for many years."
"He got the broadest coalition
ethnically and geographically of any candidate," Rep. Nadler observed.
If the election results stand, local
Democrats must repair the rift if they are to defeat media mogul Michael
Bloomberg, the Republican Party nominee.
An exit poll conducted by cable news
show NY1 stated that one third of those who say they voted for Mr.
Ferrer would stay home in November if he lost the runoff.
|