U.S. flunks human
rights test
'World's leading
democracy' isn't human rights leader, Amnesty report says
by Richard Muhammad,
Saeed Shabazz and
Nisa Islam Muhammad |
(Finalcall.com)�Amnesty International�s condemnation of rights abuses
abroad is well documented, but its annual report for 2001 put the
spotlight on a new violator of rights: The United States of America.
The "world�s greatest democracy" and self-appointed
guardian of human rights "has abdicated its duty to lead," declared
William Schultz, the executive director of Amnesty International USA,
during the May 30 release of the group�s yearly catalog of rights
heroes, villains and violations.
"The single greatest disappointment on our Top Ten
list is the decline of U.S. leadership on human rights," Mr. Schultz
told the media.
America�s failures were found in government turning a
blind eye to wrongs within her borders and in policies abroad that did
not live up to rhetoric about respect for individual rights and freedom.
Among areas of concern inside the U.S. cited by
Amnesty:
� Police misconduct and disputed police shootings of
unarmed suspects were reported; a disproportionate number of the victims
were from racial minorities. Many incidents of alleged abuse occurred at
the end of vehicle pursuits, during traffic stops, or during police
street patrols. Several suspects died after being placed in dangerous
restraint holds or subdued with pepper spray.
� Torture and ill-treatment were reported in prisons,
jails and juvenile detention facilities. Abuses included beatings and
excessive force; sexual misconduct; the misuse of electro-shock weapons
and chemical sprays; and the cruel use of mechanical restraints,
including holding prisoners for prolonged periods in four-point
restraint as punishment. Many reported abuses took place during forced
removal of prisoners from cells.
�Cruel conditions in supermaximum prisons, where
prisoners are held in prolonged detention, continued to be reported.
Amnesty International�s requests to tour such facilities in Illinois and
Virginia were turned down by the authorities.
� Children in detention were subjected to ill
treatment which included the cruel use of restraints and prolonged
isolation. Many children continued to be prosecuted as adults and sent
to adult prisons where, in some states, they were not separated from
adults and were held in inhumane or inappropriate conditions. An April
study found youths from ethnic minority groups, especially Blacks, were
more likely to be imprisoned and to serve longer sentences than white
youths charged with similar offenses.
� Male guards have continued to have unsupervised
access to women prisoners or detainees in women�s prisons and local
jails. There were allegations of sexual abuse of prisoners by male staff
in states including California, Connecticut, New York, South Carolina
and West Virginia.
� Lawrence Frazier, a diabetic died in July after
being restrained by guards and zapped with a 45,000 volt electro-shock
stun gun after becoming delirious and "combative" in the Wallens Ridge
Prison infirmary where he had been taken for hypoglycemia. Although the
prison authorities said afterwards that a doctor had ruled out the stun
weapon as a cause of death, this was discounted by many observers.
Inquiries into the death were still pending at the end of the year.
� In 2000, 85 prisoners were executed in 14 states,
bringing to 683 the total number executed since the U.S. Supreme Court
lifted a moratorium on executions in 1976. The U.S. continued to violate
international standards by using the death penalty against the mentally
impaired, individuals who were under 18 at the time of the crime, and
defendants who received inadequate legal representation. Blacks and
Latinos were also more likely to receive capital sentences.
"We fundamentally disagree ... with the assertion in
the report that the United States has become an �impediment� to the
advancement of international human rights. I think anybody who has
followed the cause of human rights around the world over the years and
the decades will realize that the United States has been and will remain
the leading advocate for human rights throughout the world," said Philip
T. Reeker, deputy spokesman of U.S. State Department, on May 30.
"And I would just say that our record speaks very
much for itself and refer you to the long shelf of Annual Human Rights
Reports that we put out, painstakingly documenting the human rights
situation in countries around the world," said Mr. Reeker.
He told reporters, "We respect the work, of course,
of non-governmental organizations that work to advance human rights, and
we often speak highly of many organizations. But obviously, in this
case, we do not agree with every conclusion that they drew."
"The Amnesty International report merely indicates to
me that they have finally caught up with what Black people have known
all along�America is morally corrupt. Our status in this society can
best be demonstrated in the Nathaniel Abraham case, and Amnesty
International was right on top of that. This country will try an
11-year-old as an adult, even though the international community says it
is wrong," commented James Mtume, a New York-based award winning music
producer and community activist for the past 30 years.
"The U.S. death penalty reflects how primitive their
criminal punishment system is. I don�t call it a justice system because
they don�t give out justice to African Americans," added Ray Winbush,
director of the Race Relations Institute at Fisk University in
Nashville.
"It is the arrogance about the U.S. that turns the
world off. They�ll tell other people about human rights violations but
won�t look in their own backyard. The U.S. was kicked out of the UN
Human Rights Committee," Dr. Winbush said.
The United Nations Economic and Social Council voted
May 3 not to re-elect the United States to the Commission for Human
Rights. This vote brought U.S. condemnation of the UN decision.
"It is generally recognized that the U.S. does things
to enhance human rights around the world. But that doesn�t mean she�s
perfect," said Steve Dimoff, vice president of the United Nations
Association of the United States of America in Washington, D.C.,
explaining the human rights commission vote.
Despite its problems, the U.S. is a leading protector
of human rights, Mr. Dimoff argued. He believes resentment over U.S.
prodding of China and Cuba on alleged rights violations may have sparked
America�s ouster from the UN panel.
That move was based on what the U.S. does abroad, not
failures at home, Mr. Dimoff said.
"That vote reflects what the rest of the world knows
about the U.S. This country is very hypocritical relative to its
treatment of African Americans and people of color. She refuses to see
the horrors of its prison system that disproportionately incarcerates
African Americans," said Mr. Winbush.
Dr. Conrad Worrill, head of the National Black United
Front, agrees. "The report highlights what Black people live and see
every day. The U.S. is ruthless in its behavior to its own Africans in
America as well as those in Africa."
Roger Wareham, co-founder of New York�s December 12th
Coalition, added, "The Amnesty International report says that the
condition of Black people in this society has not changed in 400 years.
While that may sound extreme�any Black person regardless of their
status�is susceptible to these racist police practices."
Abroad, the United States opposed an effort to ban
land mines, balked at the International Criminal Court and other
important treaties and conventions, and sacrificed human rights concerns
for political expediency, the report added.
"It is no wonder that the U.S. was ousted from the
United Nations Human Rights Commission. That defeat was precipitated in
part by waning U.S. influence and double standards practiced by various
administrations and Congresses in the U.S.," according to Mr. Schultz.
The U.S. failures were doubly disappointing because
50-years-ago Eleanor Roosevelt championed the need for universal respect
for human rights, and 25-years-ago, President Jimmy Carter placed human
rights at the center of his foreign policy, the president of Amnesty
International USA said.
"Sadly, in 2001, we have no prominent leaders in
government sounding the clarion call for human rights," Mr. Schultz
continued. "Indifference to the abuses that occur in other countries
blind us to violations at home. The U.S. government is complicit when it
trains or arms the torturer or fails to speak out vigorously about
abuses," he declared.
"South Korea was cited for human rights violations,
but the U.S. has 37,000 troops over there who are the real power in that
country. All those violations we lay at the doorsteps of the Pentagon
and the White House," said Brian Becker, co-director of the
International Action Center.
"There are serious human rights abuses in this
country that should be addressed. I do not believe that the U.S. was
kicked off the UN Human Rights Commission solely because of its domestic
human rights policies," commented Jamie Fellner, a death penalty and
criminal justice specialist for Human Rights Watch in New York.
Still, she continued, around the country groups are
challenging prison policy and seeing some results. In Texas, several
bills about application of the death penalty have reached the governor
because of international focus on death penalty abuses. In California
and New York, drug law changes that would keep users out of jail for
simple drug charges have been advocated, said Ms. Fellner. Such laws
disproportionately impact Blacks and Latinos.
"People take these reports seriously and politicians
take them seriously. We need continuous grassroots activity, if we are
to change the course reported in the Amnesty study," she said.
|