Sarah Baxter (SB): Let me start by asking you about Britain
because our readers will want to know about the history of you not
being let in and how you felt about that. For some time you�ve been
hoping to visit Britain. Were you surprised in the first instance
[1986] all those years ago when you were stopped from entering? It
must have been a bit of a shock.
Minister Louis Farrakhan (MLF): No. The climate after the
Jesse Jackson [1984 Presidential] campaign was such that the
labeling of me as an anti-Semite and the polemic of that time put me
in a position where Jewish persons felt somewhat threatened by my
presence or what I might say. So I was banned from Bermuda, from
Great Britain, but no other place that I can recall. They recently
lifted the ban in Bermuda, maybe seven years now. But in Great
Britain, I�m still hoping that I will be able to come.
SB: What led you to the legal action to apply for the ban to be
lifted? You were invited or what was going on?
MLF: I did have an invitation from Oxford to speak. They did
not know there was a ban on me. And some of the followers of the
Honorable Elijah Muhammad under my leadership in the UK decided that
they would like to pursue it legally. They came to me and asked if I
would permit them to do that. It was not my thought. I thought that
they should just continue to do the work of reforming and
transforming the lives of our people and that eventually the ban
would be lifted. But Minister Hilary [Muhammad] was so strong in his
spirit to get this ban lifted and to take the appropriate legal
action to do so. After I saw that strong spirit in him to do it, I
permitted him to do it. He marshaled the believing community and
many who were non-believers who know of me [came onboard] and they
pursued this so far to a favorable outcome.
SB: It seems a bit anachronistic that you would be banned all
through this time. You�ve been all over the world. You�ve even been
to Israel, so I don�t know why we are still hung up about it.
MLF: We were so warmly and friendly treated at the point of
entry and we never had a moment�s trouble while we were in Israel. I
did wish to see Prime Minister [Benyamin] Netanyahu at the time but
Mr. Arafat, who was my host, could not secure me into Jerusalem
because they have to have a pass and a lot of his people did not
have that pass. I did not wish to create an international incident
since my mission was peace, so I decided not to go to Jerusalem. But
I can tell you truthfully I was very, very well treated in Israel.
SB: Our Home Secretary or two Home Secretaries have said they
would still like to stop you from coming. Are you puzzled by that or
offended that they should still be so?
MLF: I don�t really think they have anything to fear from my
presence. But if the members of the Jewish community feel somewhat
threatened by my presence, then their political strength and
influence is what I think politically they do not wish to offend.
But I can assure you that should I be permitted to come to Great
Britain, the Jewish people will have nothing to fear from what I say
or what I do. And I said I would be willing to meet with the Jewish
deputies and leadership. And so we will see what happens.
SB: Some of them [Jewish leaders] have said, �oh, his
views are insulting and degrading to us, etc., that�s why we don�t
want him to come in.� They have been published saying that recently.
Do you think that even if your views were offensive there would be
no reason to stop you just on the freedom of speech issue?
MLF: I would say that some of my views may be controversial
and may be offensive. That is not my intention. I�m sure Prime
Minister [Tony] Blair, as he speaks, sometimes offends certain
groups that politically are not aligned with him. Who can speak
today and uphold a cause without offending somebody who�s in
disagreement with that cause, that ideology, or that philosophy? The
beauty of a democracy, which I feel very blessed to live in, is that
you are not afraid of another point of view because in a democracy
it presupposes the level of intelligence of the citizenry, that the
citizens would be able to determine whether the person�s speech is
what they wish to listen to, approve of, or disapprove of. And the
people that live in Great Britain, a nation that has ruled nearly
seven, eight, nine-tenths of the world, have had knowledge and
experience. They are not stupid people that I could come to England
and say things and you have to protect the poor little Black people,
and the poor little Brown people, and the poor little Jewish people
from Louis Farrakhan. That�s demeaning. They will listen to me and
put me in a category either of somebody that they would like to hear
and never hear again or somebody that is an asset. But they need to
have that chance to make that determination for themselves and not
that the government should make that determination for the citizens.
If there were a track record that I initiated violence or did things
that promoted violence, then you would have an issue to keep me out
because of that kind of track record. But I have been preaching for
now nearly 47 years�not one incident of violence. If I am such a
rabid hater of Jewish people, or White people, or Catholics or gays,
which is really ridiculous, why is there not one record of anyone
who follows me being guilty of a hate crime? Not even have we been
charged with that, much less found guilty. The people of Great
Britain have nothing to fear from my presence, but probably a lot to
gain from listening to what God has revealed to the Honorable Elijah
Muhammad for the good of the total human family.
SB: So when are you going to come?
MLF: When they permit me. I don�t want to presume that
because Justice [Michael] Turner has lifted the ban that the
government will not pursue an appeal.
SB: Have you spoken to any Jewish leaders in Britain about maybe
going �?
MLF: No, but when and if it is possible for me to go, our
representatives there will pursue the thought of meeting the Jewish
leaders, and even of speaking in the Jewish synagogue. I don�t mind
doing that. I have had rabbis come to have dinner with me in my home
and at the end of the evening one rabbi said, would you speak before
the Board of Rabbis? I said, if you could arrange it, I�d do it
tomorrow. The other rabbi said, would you speak in the synagogue? I
said, tonight, if you could arrange it. I would love that experience
because I know that the Jewish people don�t know me. They know me
through the media. And the media has tremendous power. They can make
you look like a devil or they can make you look like a saint. It
just depends on what the whim of the moment is.
SB: There have been some political racial tensions in Britain
recently. I don�t know whether you have been looking at that but
there have been some riots with young Muslims in Bradford and other
cities in the last year.
MLF: Really? I have heard of some Asians. Are they Muslims?
SB: Yes. There are all those cities Bradford, Olgan, they are
Muslim communities.
MLF: Well, what is at the root of that problem? Farrakhan has
not been there so Farrakhan could not be at the root of a
disturbance between the Muslims in Bradford and those with whom they
have a difference. My whole idea is to heal wounds, not to
exacerbate tensions. I would never come to England to feed a fire
with fuel. If you are a peacemaker, then you go and you try to make
peace. I think that�s what will benefit the country and it would
benefit both sides in the conflict. Whatever is at the root of that
conflict of which I have no knowledge, but peace would benefit the
society and peace would benefit the two who are at odds with each
other.
SB: Let me ask you about the Nation of Islam in Britain. Is that
an important part of your organization?
MLF: Oh, yes. They [UK Believers] came to know me by means of
an audio and videotape, and they began to organize around what they
saw on a videotape. I was so surprised when one year nearly 500
persons flew from the UK to our national convention, never having
seen me physically. That community, I think, would benefit from my
presence. There are always problems that my presence might be able
to solve, questions that they need answered, organizationally and
structurally.
SB: What sort of problems do you think you might be able to
solve?
MLF: The natural kind of problems that come when people are
new at something and they have different methodologies of trying to
reach a successful conclusion. And sometimes immaturity causes a
break.
SB: You mean internal things within the Nation of Islam?
MLF: Yes. My presence, hopefully, will try to heal some of
those internal problems so that they might be much more effective in
the work of transforming the lives of those brothers and sisters
there who need some intervention in the culture of drugs, in the
culture of broken marriages and homes, in the culture of self hatred
that manifests itself in criminal anti-social behavior. Religion is
supposed to be an antidote for the poison of social misfits, and
Islam has had a tremendous power to heal prisoners and those that
are the most abject in this society. I�m sure that you have seen the
effect of the teachings on members of the Black community in Great
Britain; and it would be good for the country. I�ll put it like
that.
SB: From what you understand of the problems that Black Britons
go through, very similar to people in America, do they come to you
and tell you their problems? Do they sound very familiar?
MLF: Whenever there are a few Blacks in a White society, we
are a novelty, and the relations are not bad. That�s why many Blacks
who left the United States and went to France found in France,
particularly the artistic community, a refuge. And there are many
Africans that came to countries in Europe and they were very well
received, accepted. But, as more and more and more Blacks come in,
it begins to bring out of the dominant community feelings that they
might not even have known existed. Since nine-tenths, I guess, of
the planet was under her [Great Britain�s] rule and she had many,
many, countries in Africa and Asia and in the Caribbean under her
rule, and the educational system of Great Britain, the political
system of Great Britain, became the system of governance wherever
Great Britain ruled�even when she left and they became independent
they were part of the Commonwealth of Nations�the love of Great
Britain, looking up to Great Britain, has been a part of all the
colonies. Many in the colonies want to go to this great land of
opportunity. So Great Britain offered to her former colonial
subjects a chance to experience the greatness of the British
culture. So more and more started coming; and as more and more
started coming, then Great Britain became a multi-racial,
multi-ethnic society. And that produces its tensions, its problems.
Great Britain, like America, has to find an appropriate way to deal
with the natural tensions of persons coming in to make Great Britain
their home.
Then there are the interracial marriages and what that produces,
and the different cultures and bringing those cultures to the
culture of Great Britain. Great Britain is undergoing its own
transformation. The social scientists have to find a way to help
America and Great Britain�especially these two, Australia, New
Zealand�deal with the reality of having had possessions and
subjects.
SB: It sounds like you are being very sympathetic in that sense
to the non-established White community. Or would you say, well no
I�ve just got to get on with it?
MLF: I�m not trying to be conciliatory. What I am trying to
be is realistic of the dynamic, the social dynamic, when so many
persons from Africa, from Asia, from Pakistan, from India, come to
Great Britain and Great Britain�s breast has to expand to include
what she did not plan on when Britain was established. America did
not plan on our being full-fledged citizens. It didn�t plan on the
Asians when they came to build the railroads. Now, America has to
accommodate the fact that the whole world lives inside America and
the whole world lives inside of the UK. So that�s causing the UK
growing pains.
SB: Thank you.