Since medical science has proven, again and again, that
you are what you eat, does it not seem logical to conclude
that your desired goal in life should have some influence upon your
selection of items to stuff into that opening just beneath your nose? As
I am writing this, I have before me some alarming source material from
THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE WASHINGTON POST, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE, THE
MUSLIM OBSERVER and THE JEWISH PRESS. Each of them contains
articles proving that "What you see is NOT what you get!"
The TIMES carried a story headlined "For Hindus
and Vegetarians, Surprise in McDonald�s Fries". In it, the writer
recalls that "in 1990, when the fast-food chain announced with great
fanfare that it was switching from beef fat to �100 percent vegetable
oil� to cook its French fries, Mr. (Brij) Sharma joined the legions of
Hindu Americans and vegetarians who began venturing into McDonald�s to
nibble what they believed were vegetarian fries." The article recounts
how horrified he was in April when he saw a headline in his INDIA
WEST newspaper which read, "Where�s the Beef? It�s in Your French
Fries." He, along with other American Hindus, were outraged, the article
says, "to learn that McDonald�s French fries are seasoned in the factory
with beef flavoring before they are sent to the restaurants to be cooked
in vegetable oil." He is one of three litigants who filed a lawsuit on
May 1, in Seattle. In India, the reaction was more speedy, as well as
immediately damaging. Reportedly, restaurant windows were smashed,
statues of Ronald McDonald were smeared with cow dung and Hindu
Nationalist Politicians called for the entire McDonald�s chain to be
evicted from the country.
McDonald�s executives have denied publicly that they
ever claimed that the French Fries sold in the United States were
vegetarian. McDonald�s spokesman Walt Riker is alleged to have told
interviewers, "We certainly don�t market ourselves as vegetarian." He is
further quoted as stating that, although they may re-evaluate their
labeling policies, they have no intention of altering their recipe.
On a similar note, a front page story in the May 11th
edition of THE MUSLIM OBSERVER carries the headline, "They Sell
Pork And Call It Halal". It begins by noting that a Turkish company has
sued an American company, "accusing it of violating a contract by
supplying grease, used in livestock feed, tainted with laced pork fat to
the predominantly Muslim country."
"Ironically," the article states, "most of the meat
Muslims buy from the so-called halal grocery stores is fed animal
by-products including rotten feathers and pork." Reportedly, a livestock
extension agent informed the Associated Press that most livestock feeds
contain some grease to cut down on dust and to increase the energy
levels of the livestock. He said that the grease could contain grease
obtained from cows, sheep, goats or pigs.
A NY TIMES article reports that during a recent
investigation in New York and New Jersey, "The problems at the 22 plants
included rodent infestation and germ-ridden processing
equipment....Three plants in New York City were temporarily shut down."
Unless something very dramatic displaces it, this column
next issue will examine an article featured in the National Weekly
Edition of THE WASHINGTON POST dated March 27, 2000. It deals
with all these potions on the shelves of health food stores. The article
was entitled :"All Natural And Dangerous."