WEB
POSTED 03-13-2001
You Still 'Are What You Eat'!!!
A retired cardiologist was recently quoted as stating, "We
need to eat food like our ancestors did�from the farm directly to
the table." Dr. L.T. Bhramdat told a gathering of farmers in O�Neill,
Nebraska, "That�s food without chemicals, additives, colors,
artificial flavorings and synthetically added vitamins and
minerals." He identified such food as "the best health
insurance policy one can have."
Recent articles in the news bulletin entitled
"FEATURETTES For Editors", published by North American
Precis Syndicate, also emphasize the need to alter our diet, and
indicate that many are doing just that. One NAPS article points out
that more Americans are going meatless, and reports that the sale of
meat substitutes reached $250 million in 1998, and is fast approaching
the $1 billion mark. The same article quotes an American Dietetic
Association position paper as reporting that, "Scientific data
suggest positive relationships between diets containing vegetables and
reduced risk for several chronic, degenerative diseases and
conditions, including obesity, coronary artery disease, hypertension,
diabetes mellitus and some types of cancer." The bulk of most
meat substitutes are made up of plant protein, and are lower in fat,
higher in fiber and have no cholesterol. Another article in a NAPS
paper recommends eating "9-10 servings of fruits and vegetables a
day; 2-3 servings of low-fat or fat free dairy foods a day, 7-8
servings of grains and grain products, such as bread, rice or oatmeal
a day and 2 or less servings of meat, poultry or fish a day."
At least they are headed in the right direction,
but they have not quite arrived. Writer Lance Gay, in the March 2
edition of the CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, wrote an article headlined
"STORE CHICKEN FILLED WITH DEFECTS". It begins with the
statement that, "Almost 40 percent of the chickens heading to
supermarket shelves from model plants last year were contaminated with
sores, scabs and other �defects� that should have been detected on
the processing line, internal Agriculture Department documents
show." Such defects, stated the writer, included: "39.8
percent were found defective with sores, scabs, bruises or other
processing defects; 18.8 percent were found contaminated with material
from the chicken�s digestive tract; 98.8 percent had other defects
involving feathers, hair or oil glands that weren�t properly removed
on the process line."
While a Food Safety and Inspection Service
representative refused to comment on these findings, Carol Tucker
Foreman, director of the Consumer Federation of America�s food
policy institute, said the survey shows "troubling quality
control problems", and concluded that, "None of us want pus
and sores on our chicken."
In Europe, experts from the Scientific Committee on
Food, sponsored by the European Union, as well as from the Committee
on Animal Nutrition, have issued reports indicating, "ON THE
HEELS OF MAD COW FEARS, NOW IT�S THE DIOXIN IN THE FISH".
It seems to be getting clearer and clearer that my lifelong friend,
Dick Gregory, has the right idea when he states, in slightly less
polite terms, that he doesn�t eat anything that has a bowel
movement.
Maybe we�ll get to this again�especially from a
Biblical point of view.
|